From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xose Vazquez Perez Subject: Re: SCSI Disk layer performance Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:17:30 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <400FF79A.6050108@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp14.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.114]:12270 "EHLO smtp14.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264557AbUAVQVm (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:21:42 -0500 Received: from [192.168.108.57] (helo=mx07.eresmas.com) by smtp14.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1AjhaJ-0006rn-00 for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:21:35 +0100 Received: from [80.103.138.182] (helo=wanadoo.es) by mx07.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AjhaK-0004Yt-NO for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:21:37 +0100 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi Christoph Hellwig wrote: > What kernel tree do you use? If you're looking for decent scsi > performance use linux 2.6 or the SuSE/RH vendor trees. Stock Linux 2.4 ^^^^^^ _Enterprise_ kernels, RHEL or SLES. Fedora Core kernel is, more or less, a plain kernel.org. I'm runnig RHEL 2.4.21-9.EL kernel and it's _much better_ than any 2.4.xx kernel.org. I could call it 2.5 because it's a mix of 2.4 and 2.6 ;-) -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's bug free.