From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Burgener Subject: Re: iptables abilities Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:59:15 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <4010E263.1080902@objeng.ch> References: <400FC047.4010208@objeng.ch> <200401221233.18553.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <400FD514.9060500@objeng.ch> <1089.12.75.166.13.1074782849.squirrel@nmibwkrf1.nexusmgmt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1089.12.75.166.13.1074782849.squirrel@nmibwkrf1.nexusmgmt.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "John A. Sullivan III" Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Dear John John A. Sullivan III wrote: > Is there any point at which you could use DNAT/SNAT to change each private > address to a public address? Alternately, can you build a VPN tunnel > between the two and tunnel the private addresses through the tunnel? Perhaps a VPN tunnel would be the best solution. How would such a thing be established though, given that both A and B have private addresses? The two connections between A <--> X and X <--> B need to somehow be interconnected. Can this be done with VPN? >>>> (Internet) (Internet) >>>> A <------------> X <------------> B >>>> >>>>A: 192.168.1.13 >>>>B: 192.168.1.99 >>>>X: public IP address Cheers Sven