All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Borgerding <mark@borgerding.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC]   "smack the penguin"  2.4 vs 2.6
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:08:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40129898.6020702@borgerding.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <401284CD.7080006@borgerding.net>

Mark Borgerding wrote:

> Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
>> #include <hallo.h>
>> * Chris Friesen [Fri, Jan 23 2004, 02:36:59PM]:
>>  
>>
>>> Diversion for friday afternoon...how far can you get?
>>>
>>> Personal best is 586
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Which means that you are playing it either on a Windows box (what a
>> shame) or cheating somehow or you have a 5Ghz box or something else is
>> wrong on regular Linux systems. I do not any Linux user who got
>> more than 325.5 with the Linux version of the Shockwave plugin.
>>  
>>
>
> Sounds like 3/4 of the programmers I've ever worked with --  if they 
> can't figure out how to do it, then it can't be done and anyone who 
> says otherwise must be lying or cheating.
>
>
> Still, it does seem like the game is much less predictable on some 
> systems.  I have a linux laptop that plays it quite nicely (thus the 
> 593.4 I reported earlier).  I tried it on my desktop at home, and it 
> was very jerky.
>
> The two systems are pretty comparable.
>
> For anyone who cares: here's the main differences with laptop (good) 
> on the left and the desktop (bad) on the right:
>
> Mozilla: 1.5 on both, build dates 20031107 vs 20031007
> Flash Version:    6.0.79.0   vs   6.0.69.0
> CPU:   Pent M 1700   vs Athlon XP 2100+
> Video: ATI Radeon M9 vs Matrox G400      <=== I think this is the problem
> Kernel: 2.4.21 (debian) vs 2.6.1
>
> I am going to reboot to check against the 2.4 kernel. Who knows? Maybe 
> there will be a pingu bug report against the 2.6 kernel series.


... doesn't seem the same.

It appears that 2.4.22 may be better suited to penguin abuse than 2.6.1.

I rebooted my desktop to 2.4.22.  Within a minute,  I tied my record 
from the laptop.
( http://www.borgerding.net/pingu_proof.png )

Still, the results are far from scientific or conclusive.  I need some 
objective smackage.
Maybe I will try a blind study with my nieces tonight.  I'll reboot the 
machine into either 2.4.22 or 2.6.1 and record their scores.

Coming soon to a techie-site near you, "Pingumark 2004".

- Mark Borgerding




  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-24 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-23 19:36 [OFFTOPIC] "smack the penguin" Chris Friesen
2004-01-23 12:02 ` Witukind
2004-01-23 21:20   ` Robert White
2004-01-23 21:38     ` Witukind
2004-01-23 21:55     ` Ingo Oeser
2004-01-23 21:11 ` Omkhar Arasaratnam
2004-01-26 13:10   ` Andrei Mikhailovsky
2004-01-23 21:47 ` Markus Plail
2004-01-23 21:54   ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-01-23 23:11 ` Mark Borgerding
2004-01-23 23:29 ` Jonathan Higdon
2004-01-24  9:52 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-01-24 10:07   ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-24 10:16     ` Rus Foster
2004-01-24 10:30     ` Han Boetes
2004-01-24 11:06       ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-24 21:36       ` Marcos D. Marado Torres
2004-01-24 21:41         ` Marcos D. Marado Torres
2004-01-24 22:19           ` Nuno Alexandre
2004-01-24 23:06             ` Neil Ferguson
2004-01-27 20:28               ` "Fernando O. Korndörfer"
2004-01-24 23:11             ` jdow
2004-01-25  0:00               ` David S. Miller
2004-01-25 10:22           ` Rob
2004-01-24 23:14         ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-01-24 13:26     ` Witukind
2004-01-24 10:09   ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-01-24 10:13   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2004-01-24 10:33     ` Lionel Bouton
2004-01-24 11:57   ` Tomasz Torcz
2004-01-24 14:44   ` Mark Borgerding
2004-01-24 16:08     ` Mark Borgerding [this message]
2004-01-27 10:13 ` Voicu Liviu
2004-01-27 10:27 ` Voicu Liviu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40129898.6020702@borgerding.net \
    --to=mark@borgerding.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.