From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Subject: Re: IMQ Replacement Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:17:21 +0000 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <4015AE11.1090607@dsl.pipex.com> References: <1068652569.27810.450.camel@cumulus> <1074352525.4761.1389.camel@peterlaptop> <400BDCB6.2000208@pobox.com> <400D0B7F.90104@o2.pl> <400E9246.3020601@pobox.com> <40150537.4040501@pobox.com> <20040126144206.GA11104@zion.homelinux.com> <40153757.2010108@dsl.pipex.com> Reply-To: andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <40153757.2010108@dsl.pipex.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Cc: Netfilter Mailing List Andy Furniss wrote: > There is also discussion on the LARTC list at the moment - someone > called roy has rewritten IMQ but still sees crashes. He thinks they are > related to locally generated traffic, so IMQ for ingress should be OK. He just posted this, thought it may be of interest. Finaly I made imq driver stable it did not crashed for all 5 hours under high load, soo looks stable. (old one was crashing after 1-5 min for me) no need to patch anything just compile and insmod, should work with any kernel probably must be > than 2.4.20 This is completely diferent code than old imq. you can find it on my server http://pupa.da.ru please tell how it works for you and how stable it is.