From: P@draigBrady.com
To: bridge@osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] forwarding delay
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:15:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4016B8E3.6050701@draigBrady.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm using linux 2.4.20 here and noticed that even
when STP is disabled for a bridge, the forwarding delay
still takes affect. Is this correct? I.E. Does the
bridge need to spend time in the "listening" and
"learning" states when STP isn't used?
It's an easy work around to set the delay to 0,
I'm just wondering whether it's a buglet or
by design.
thanks,
Pádraig.
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-27 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-27 19:15 P [this message]
2004-01-28 0:08 ` [Bridge] forwarding delay Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4016B8E3.6050701@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=bridge@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.