From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: mm vs. official for reiser4. Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:38:47 -0800 Message-ID: <4023D127.7030301@namesys.com> References: <16419.38404.592630.141335@laputa.namesys.com> <20040206140319.GC30481@favonius> <16419.41118.153096.216109@laputa.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <16419.41118.153096.216109@laputa.namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Nikita Danilov Cc: sander@humilis.net, Reiserfs developers mail-list , Reiserfs mail-list Until we have removed all bugs that we can hit with internal testing, we will produce snapshots for use with only one kernel branch. I am guessing that more reiser4 testers will use Linus kernel than Morton's. Readers should correct me if I err..... Nikita Danilov wrote: >Sander writes: > > Hi Nikita, > > > > Nikita Danilov wrote (ao): > > > new snapshot has been released. It is mainly bug-fixing release. > > > > > > Take a look at the READ.ME for the list of known problems. > > > > There are two LATEST_IS files in the snapshots dir. > >Thanks, fixed. > > > > > Btw, can you please make a snapshot against the -mm tree? I think that > > would help to get it included in that tree. > >Well, making two snapshots is kind of "double trouble", because both has >to be tested and bug reports for them have to be handled. What we can >do, on the other hand, is to make a decision to switch to the -mm series >completely. But this is for Hans to decide. > >Are you actually having any problems with applying/running snapshot on >top of -mm? > > > > > Thanks for this release! > > > > With kind regards, Sander > >Nikita. > > > > > > >