From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263107AbUBHPwD (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:52:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263742AbUBHPwD (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:52:03 -0500 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:21643 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263107AbUBHPwB (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:52:01 -0500 X-Authenticated: #3450509 Message-ID: <402656CB.7070701@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:33:31 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Georg_M=FCller?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031211 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cpufreq - less possible freqs with 2.6.2 and P4M References: <402562D4.7010706@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.4.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Måns Rullgård wrote: > Which cpufreq module are you using? With p4-clockmod I get lots of > choices, with acpi only the two you mentioned. > Ok, that works. With P4 clockmod only there are the freqs I wanted :-) Thx, Georg Müller