From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263568AbUBIITT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:19:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264339AbUBIITT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:19:19 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([63.209.29.3]:38797 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263568AbUBIITS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:19:18 -0500 Message-ID: <40274277.5080808@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:19:03 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040105 X-Accept-Language: en, sv, es, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ricky Beam CC: Linux Kernel Mail List Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ricky Beam wrote: > On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>Right, this is basically for 2.6/2.7 depending on if there are any >>stragglers who still use these things... > > nettty (whatever you may find it named) uses the BSD pty interface. I don't > know how much work it would be to get it to use /dev/pts. I've not used it > for many years, so I cannot say anyone would care if it stopped working. > > The code is at least 7 years old (originally written by Livingston.) > The porting effort is usually trivial assuming one has access to the source. -hpa