From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vince <fuzzy77@free.fr>
Subject: Re: mm vs. official for reiser4.
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:41:25 +0100
Message-ID: <40277FF5.8050800@free.fr>
References: <16419.38404.592630.141335@laputa.namesys.com>	<20040206140319.GC30481@favonius> <16419.41118.153096.216109@laputa.namesys.com> <4023D127.7030301@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-16734-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <4023D127.7030301@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>, Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>, Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>

Count another vote in favour of the -mm branch. My opinion is that most 
reiser4 testers will also be likely to run the most "bleeding-edge" 
kernel branch...

Hans Reiser wrote:
> Until we have removed all bugs that we can hit with internal testing, we 
> will produce snapshots for use with only one kernel branch.  I am 
> guessing that more reiser4 testers will use Linus kernel than Morton's.  
> Readers should correct me if I err.....
>