From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>,
Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: mm vs. official for reiser4.
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:23:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4028246C.3050403@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40277FF5.8050800@free.fr>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Not me. I do this scientifically -- if something breaks, I want to know
it's reiser4, and not -mm. But I know nothing about kernel politics, so
I can't say what you should do, only that I am not "bleeding-edge" about
most things.
Vince wrote:
| Count another vote in favour of the -mm branch. My opinion is that most
| reiser4 testers will also be likely to run the most "bleeding-edge"
| kernel branch...
|
| Hans Reiser wrote:
|
|> Until we have removed all bugs that we can hit with internal testing,
|> we will produce snapshots for use with only one kernel branch. I am
|> guessing that more reiser4 testers will use Linus kernel than
|> Morton's. Readers should correct me if I err.....
|>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=ucqy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-10 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-06 13:26 Last reiser4 snapshot is at: http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.02.06/ Nikita Danilov
2004-02-06 14:03 ` Sander
2004-02-06 14:11 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-06 14:30 ` Sander
2004-02-06 17:38 ` mm vs. official for reiser4 Hans Reiser
2004-02-06 4:16 ` Steven Cole
2004-02-06 17:58 ` Sander
2004-02-08 16:50 ` Craig Knox
2004-02-09 12:41 ` Vince
2004-02-09 18:05 ` Clifford Beshers
2004-02-10 0:23 ` David Masover [this message]
2004-02-07 15:22 ` stat-data problems with the 2004.02.06 snapshot Henning Westerholt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4028246C.3050403@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com \
--cc=Reiserfs-List@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.