From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265494AbUBJApY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:45:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265383AbUBJApV (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:45:21 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:35031 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265590AbUBJAn4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:43:56 -0500 Message-ID: <40282A37.4090502@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:47:51 -0600 From: Karl Tatgenhorst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: >Hi all, > >Does anyone still care about old-style BSD ptys, i.e. /dev/pty*? I'm >thinking of restructuring the pty system slightly to make it more >dynamic and to make use of the new larger dev_t, and I'd like to get >rid of the BSD ptys as part of the same patch. > > -hpa > > Hi, Thanks for asking. I had a critical application that depended on them until last week and am now happy to say that even they have moved on (I protested the small number of available ptys and explained the direction that Unix is going with Unix98 style ptys. Now I depend on those. I would be very interested in seeing what you do with your pty restructuring as I have a large amount of serial devices. Karl Tatgenhorst