From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266074AbUBJToA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:44:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266186AbUBJToA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:44:00 -0500 Received: from prgy-npn1.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.37]:19460 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266074AbUBJTn7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:43:59 -0500 Message-ID: <40293561.20402@tmr.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:47:45 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? References: <1ne1M-1Oc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> In-Reply-To: <1ne1M-1Oc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone still care about old-style BSD ptys, i.e. /dev/pty*? I'm > thinking of restructuring the pty system slightly to make it more > dynamic and to make use of the new larger dev_t, and I'd like to get > rid of the BSD ptys as part of the same patch. > > -hpa