From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1BMGmi04536
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:16:48 -0500
Message-ID: <402AAB52.7010405@sympatico.ca>
From: Avtar Gill <av_gill@sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [linux-lvm] SuSE 9.0 and LVM2
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/>
Date: Wed Feb 11 17:16:07 2004
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

This is a general question to anyone out there currently using
LVM2 with SuSE Professional 9.0 on production servers (or
workstations). Would you be kind enough to share your experiences
with the rest of us? Did you experience any minor or major issues
along the way? SuSE 9.0 ships with LVM 1.* by default but I thought
it might be a good idea to implement new servers with LVM 2.*
instead so upgrading to future versions of SuSE (with kernel 2.6)
will be less of a hassle. Any thoughts or comments?