From: himbA <goavr@email.si>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] kernel bootparams
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:47:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <402B67C1.7060403@email.si> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040211232757.704EAC108D@atlas.denx.de>
i apoligize since i sent first reply to Wolfgang Denk only, my mail
client tricked me :)
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <402AB73F.5010803@email.si> you wrote:
>
>>I have a board, pxa based, and it has u-boot burnt, but i don't have the
>>source from which it was compiled from, so i don't have any config
>>setting (got the board as-is).
>
>
> Then request the source from the guys who gave/sold you the board.
> U-Boot is under GPL and they MUST give you the full source code,
> including all modifications they might have made, _ffor_free_.
>
got it today, the forgot to include on the cd they gave me.
>
>>for now booting is made from flash, loading both kernel and ramdisk. i
>>want to try nfs based booting and first strange thing i notice when
>>kernel gets booted is that kernel parameters are always the same, no
>>matter to what i set 'bootargs' var in u-boot. it always displays
>
>
> Probably the kernel uses it's own bootstrap loader which includes a
> hard-wired command line.
and how could i tell if such bootstrap loader exists ? as far as i know
there is nothing present on flash except u-boot and u-boot env.
>
>
>>I also tried changing CONFIG_CMDLINE setting in .config of the kernel to
>>same value as bootargs but still notihng changed.
>>
>>If CONFIG_BOOTARGS var in u-boot is specified during compile time, does
>>it interfere with bootargs passed at boot time ?
>
>
> No, this is just the default value which can be overwritten by the
> standard setenv command.
>
ok, that means kernel line supplied to the kernel is hardwired, i guess,
somewhere else.
>
>>i will copile u-boot from CVS tomorrow (need to create new board
>>defines), just need to clear some stuff now...
>
>
> Complain at the guys who gave you the board!!
>
i did, and i got it - but they have 1.0.0 sources ported and said they
tried porting cvs version, but had some problems.
are there major changes from 1.0.0 and current cvs (1.0.2)? it is only a
patch revision according to numbering in README as I recall, so how
different could it be.
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
thank, you
regards, himba
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-12 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 23:14 [U-Boot-Users] kernel bootparams himbA
2004-02-11 23:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-02-12 11:47 ` himbA [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=402B67C1.7060403@email.si \
--to=goavr@email.si \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.