From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1CHg9i05300 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:42:09 -0500 Received: from percy.comedia.it (percy.comedia.it [212.97.59.71]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1CHg9b27516 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:42:09 -0500 Message-ID: <402BBAEF.8000508@comedia.it> From: Luca Berra MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM2 on top of RAID1? (x86_64) References: <20040212100955.3b79511c.kilpatds@oppositelock.org> In-Reply-To: <20040212100955.3b79511c.kilpatds@oppositelock.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Feb 12 12:41:05 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Cc: linux-lvm@sistina.com Douglas Kilpatrick wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= writes: > > >>Douglas Kilpatrick writes: > > >>>complains about seeing 3 extra instances of the id, and decides that >>>the PV is actually on /dev/sda (or /dev/sdb, depending on boot), not >>>/dev/md1. > > >>I have a similar setup and ran into the same problem. I solved it by >>placing this in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf: >> >>devices { >> filter = [ "r,hd," ] >>} > i still believe it would be better if lvm ignored md component devices completely. L.