All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Burgess <lkml@jburgess.uklinux.net>
To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext2/3 performance regression in 2.6 vs 2.4 for small interleaved writes
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:15:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <402CBFEF.9050209@jburgess.uklinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402120502.39300.mhf@linuxmail.org>

Michael Frank wrote:

>Could you please boot with scheduler=deadline to compare apples with apples.
>  
>
The schedular did not make a significant difference, both returned 
0.34MB/s for the worst case.

    Jon


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-13 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-11 19:04 ext2/3 performance regression in 2.6 vs 2.4 for small interleaved writes Jon Burgess
2004-02-11 20:28 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-11 21:02   ` Michael Frank
2004-02-11 21:18     ` Diego Calleja
2004-02-12  2:00       ` Dave Olien
2004-02-12  2:23         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-12  9:42           ` ext2/3 performance regression in 2.6 vs 2.4 for small interl Giuliano Pochini
2004-02-12 10:15             ` John Bradford
2004-02-12 10:27             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-12 17:05               ` Michael Frank
2004-02-12 17:18                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-12 20:55                   ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-13  1:57                     ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-13  2:05                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-12 14:59             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-13 12:15     ` Jon Burgess [this message]
2004-02-12 10:40   ` ext2/3 performance regression in 2.6 vs 2.4 for small interleaved writes Jon Burgess
2004-02-12 20:17     ` Hans Reiser
2004-02-12  9:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-12 20:20   ` Jon Burgess
2004-02-13  8:28     ` Juan Piernas Canovas
2004-02-16 17:51     ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-02-16 20:03       ` Jon Burgess
2004-02-13 12:35   ` Jon Burgess
2004-02-14 15:00   ` Jon Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=402CBFEF.9050209@jburgess.uklinux.net \
    --to=lkml@jburgess.uklinux.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhf@linuxmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.