From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.211]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DD8486E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 07:51:52 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <402E361C.7090401@tiscali.be> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:52:12 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc-2.3.3 & gcc-snapshot (3.5.0) pb References: <20040211162702.GI990@baldric.uwo.ca> <402A4CA500001B4D@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <20040213194906.GA6760@baldric.uwo.ca> <20040214001729.GA4727@colo.lackof.org> In-Reply-To: <20040214001729.GA4727@colo.lackof.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Carlos O'Donell , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, John David Anglin List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Grundler wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:49:08PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >>Aggressive inlining, and inlining mistakes might cause the function to >>disapper. Unless you can produce a *small* testcase the gcc team will >>not look at the bug. You can't say "glibc doesn't build with gcc-3.5" >>... well I guess you can, but nobody will have a clue how to fix the >>issue. > I understand, so better try to find a fix myself? In the mean time, as James find the shmem BUG(), I take a more to time to look for gcc ml archive ;) And I find on gcc-help a another pb of asm inlining and advise of change . If I don't reach to find an elegant solution, can I also address some messages on gcc-help ml? > > And he should say *something*. > Pointing at the problem is a first step towards fixing it. > Don't wait until you have a "small" test case to point out a problem > since one might never (have time to) find one. > > Even though I fix very few bugs these days, I'm grateful for > every bug report. > Thanks to all for advise and attention, Joel