From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
To: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@kth.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:11:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4030A561.8070701@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xy8r3e7gb.fsf@ford.guide>
Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> writes:
>
>
> /proc/modules uses only _ so you could use ${module_name/-/_}.
>
Please check the archive: My original complaint was about the
inconsistency between /proc/modules listing all modules with '_',
and the module filenames using both '-' and '_'. For me it is
not important which version is better. As a developer I have to
assume that '_' and '-' are ambiguous in this context. This
ambiguity is pretty strange for Unix, isn't it?
Regards
Harri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1o903-5d8-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pkw6-3BU-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1prnS-4x8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-15 15:02 ` 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 7:21 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-16 8:48 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-16 11:11 ` Harald Dunkel [this message]
2004-02-16 14:13 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 14:22 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 19:01 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-18 21:58 ` Tony Breeds
[not found] <1pw4i-hM-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pLmG-4E7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pRLz-21o-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pRVi-2am-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pWi8-65a-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-16 23:28 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-17 6:09 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-17 16:02 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-17 16:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-17 19:49 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-11 19:54 Harald Dunkel
2004-02-15 2:38 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2004-02-15 9:58 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-17 7:41 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-18 1:28 ` Wakko Warner
2004-02-18 8:46 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-18 17:25 ` Wakko Warner
2004-02-19 1:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4030A561.8070701@t-online.de \
--to=harald.dunkel@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@kth.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.