From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AsoxC-0003yN-NL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:02:54 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AsowQ-0003bv-AY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:02:37 -0500 Received: from [193.252.22.30] (helo=mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Asouz-00031D-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:00:37 -0500 Received: from free.fr (ATuileries-112-1-4-252.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.53.133.252]) by mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EFD0A1BFB3AF for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:00:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <403121B1.8040205@free.fr> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:01:53 +0100 From: Fabrice Bellard MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu simple user mode testing (arm, ppc, sparc) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org You usually get this exception if a FPU instruction is used (qemu does not support FPU on sparc yet). Fabrice. Karel Gardas wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > > >>Interesting ! I thought that SPARC was the less stable target (I left >>some register window exception problems in it)... > > > I have just finished cross-compilation of MICO (http://www.mico.org) and > try small demo which failed with: > > thinkpad:/mnt/karel/mico-sparc/demo/bench$ qemu-sparc -L /mnt/karel/cross/crosstool-0.27/result/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-3.3.2-glibc-2.3.2/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/ ./server > Unhandled trap: 0x2 > pc: 0x0002a2f8 npc: 0x0002a2fc > General Registers: > %g0: 0x00000000 %g1: 0x0031e070 %g2: 0x0042b000 %g3: 0x0042cf70 > %g4: 0x00000000 %g5: 0x00005f00 %g6: 0xff000000 %g7: 0x401f3468 > Current Register Window: > %o0: 0x00215ccc %o1: 0x00000000 %o2: 0x003c3110 %o3: 0x0042b4cc > %o4: 0x3000474c %o5: 0x401db790 %o6: 0x401db6d8 %o7: 0x00303d8c > %l0: 0x0042a070 %l1: 0x402079c0 %l2: 0x42367314 %l3: 0x42374a7a > %l4: 0x00000002 %l5: 0x40207cc8 %l6: 0x00000000 %l7: 0x0042a824 > %i0: 0x0042a0cc %i1: 0x402079c0 %i2: 0x00000338 %i3: 0x00000334 > %i4: 0x000007a9 %i5: 0x00000005 %i6: 0x401db740 %i7: 0x00127640 > psr: 0x0000001c -> ---- wim: 0x00000002 > thinkpad:/mnt/karel/mico-sparc/demo/bench$ > > So, indeed, there are still some issues. :-) > > Anyway, overall impression from QEMU is very good, I just hope that I will > be able to use it for our MICO related testing for x-linux (where x != > x86) platforms -- I plan to do some testing of a bit larger C++ app for > you, if you are interested. > > Thanks, > > Karel > -- > Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com > ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > >