From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: patch-o-matic problem Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:16:55 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40314F67.4080104@eurodev.net> References: <000801c3f4b9$8eb883d0$4900a8c0@racoon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Sandeep Singh Kohli , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <000801c3f4b9$8eb883d0$4900a8c0@racoon> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org hi! Sandeep Singh Kohli wrote: > hi > i dunno whether i have to mail here > i downloaded the latest path-o-matic version from the CVS > I dunno whether there should be a sequence in which one midule > compiles over other..cos there were MANY problems while compiling the > kernel you should pay attention because some patches could break others, so appliying all the patches is not a good idea. > i mean whas the point in building a firewall when u had to comment out > majority of the code patch-matic is a set of patches that are not included in the standalone version of netfilter/iptables because they are not considerated stable yet. So it's your responsability using them. In fact patch-o-matic-ng is still a work in progress. best regards, Pablo