From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Mahoney Subject: Re: Lost ACL Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:13:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4034EEB2.6090208@suse.com> References: <402CE469.4010809@gbf.de> <402D1B26.3040009@suse.com> <16429.7163.319615.173151@laputa.namesys.com> <402D37F5.9040008@suse.com> <4034EAAE.2050908@gbf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <4034EAAE.2050908@gbf.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Joachim Reichelt Cc: Nikita Danilov , reiserfs-list@Namesys.COM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joachim Reichelt wrote: |> i just got 2.4.25 up. |> But there is no ACL anywhere in the kernel. |> Do I have to patch something |> I found ACL in ext3, xfs.... |> So there are NO ACLs in the code????????? ACLs and Extended Attributes are an external patch. The SuSE kernels have them by default, which is why you were able to use them with your SuSE install. Periodically, I sync up the ACL code with the mainline kernels. Expect an updated version for 2.4.25 later today on my ftp site: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/jeffm/reiserfs/aclea/ - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SuSE Labs jeffm@suse.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFANO6xLPWxlyuTD7IRAu5IAJ97+B9WONZcHLIhdsnZKPpBgnbbJQCeIKlT UG3CroWtW/w6Ffg3StT/zG8= =QdJX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----