From: "Nick Warne" <nick@ukfsn.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.3 RT8139too NIC problems
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:17:32 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4034EFAC.21065.4E1A8B4@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040219171122.GA17199@linux-sh.org>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:47:08PM -0000, Nick Warne wrote:
> > >From my config file:
> >
> > # CONFIG_8139CP is not set
> > CONFIG_8139TOO=y
> > # CONFIG_8139TOO_PIO is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139TOO_8129 is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139_OLD_RX_RESET is not set
> > # CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX= is not set
> >
> > No other NIC drivers are used.
> >
> > I am also stuck as to what the new RXBUF_IDX is for. It appears the
> > new build needs it, as I cannot remove.
> >
> So read the help entry in Kconfig. Before this change went in, pretty much
> everyone defaulted to a 32k receive ring size, which is also the current
> default. If you had used the default value of 2 instead of trying to hack
> around it, you might get better behavior from your driver..
Hi Paul,
My bad...
I did use the default 2... unfortunately that snippet I copied here
was what I tried to do to rebuild kernel with out it, but make just
adds the line back in CONFIG and asks what option I what.
So it is set to 2 as per the default.
So, corrected (and as the kernel was built):
# CONFIG_8139CP is not set
CONFIG_8139TOO=y
# CONFIG_8139TOO_PIO is not set
# CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER is not set
# CONFIG_8139TOO_8129 is not set
# CONFIG_8139_OLD_RX_RESET is not set
CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX=2
Nick
--
"I am not Spock", said Leonard Nimoy.
"And it is highly illogical of humans to assume so."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-19 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 16:47 2.6.3 RT8139too NIC problems Nick Warne
2004-02-19 17:11 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-19 17:17 ` Nick Warne [this message]
2004-02-19 22:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-20 16:42 ` Nick Warne
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-19 20:04 Nick Warne
2004-02-21 14:59 Nick Warne
[not found] ` <14539106.1077630890@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk>
2004-02-24 18:23 ` Nick Warne
2004-02-24 20:36 Nick Warne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4034EFAC.21065.4E1A8B4@localhost \
--to=nick@ukfsn.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.