From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Mahoney Subject: Re: Lost ACL Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:29:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4034F26E.1000909@suse.com> References: <402CE469.4010809@gbf.de> <402D1B26.3040009@suse.com> <40307380.7030909@gbf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <40307380.7030909@gbf.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Joachim Reichelt Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joachim Reichelt wrote: | when i do | # mount -treiserfs -o acl /dev/sda9 /home/ | mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda9, | or too many mounted file systems | | So I tried: | # mount /home | mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda9, | or too many mounted file systems | | # grep sda9 /etc/fstab | /dev/sda9 /home reiserfs | defaults,noatime,acl 1 2 | | # mount /dev/sda9 /home | -> successs | | # uname -a | Linux zibsrv34 2.4.19-4GB #1 Fri Sep 13 13:14:56 UTC 2002 i686 unknown | | It is a default SuSE kernel. I cannot update at now, couse I have a | IDE-Raid with binary only driver. Sorry for the late reply, for some reason this didn't make it into my inbox. If you're using a SuSE kernel from that time frame, it should definately have ACLs built in to the reiserfs module. What is the result of "zgrep CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL /proc/config.gz" ? - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SuSE Labs jeffm@suse.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFANPJuLPWxlyuTD7IRAk7sAJ9jpmUfbwyRiZyH2kzXNEIJgjZcOACfVIXP haa/H1iKoHBqfZxEPecPmws= =ElL5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----