From: Tom Georgoulias <tom.georgoulias@motorola.com>
To: autofs@linux.kernel.org, raven@themaw.net
Subject: newly added heirarchical mount points not found
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:02:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403AA2A7.3010409@motorola.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402211534050.4697@raven.themaw.net>
Hi:
I'd like to know if the heirarchical mount point behavior I've been
seeing lately with autofs4 is what I should expect. When I add an
additional submount point to an existing set of heirarchical mounts, I
cannot access the file system referenced by the new mount point.
The systems I am seeing this behavior on are Red Hat 8.0 and 7.3 systems
with the 2.4.20-28.8bigmem and 2.4.20-28.7bigmem kernels (and the
autofs4 module it contains) and autofs-4.1.0-2.
I have a set of entries in one of my NIS automount maps very similar to
these: (names changed to protect the innocent. ;)
in automount map auto.stuff
--
top \
/key2 bender:/vol_A/key2 \
/key3 fry:/vol_B/key3 \
/key4 fry:/vol_B/key4
--
Using "cd /stuff/top/key3" works just fine from both my linux and
solaris systems.
However, if I add an entry for key9:
--
top \
/key2 bender:/vol_A/key2 \
/key3 fry:/vol_B/key3 \
/key9 mom:/vol_B/key9 \
/key4 fry:/vol_B/key4
--
and push out the updated map, a "cd /stuff/top/key9" only works on
Solaris. The linux systems see the new entry via "ypmatch -k top
auto.stuff", but I get a "No such file or directory" error when I try to
cd into it. Today I tried testing this with the
autofs4-2.4-module-20031201, just to see if it helped, but the problem
still remains. According to the README file the new module only
provides ghosting, but I figured I didn't have a lot to lose by testing
it anyway.
The only way I've found to safely and reliably can access the new mounts
is to reboot the system, since restarting the autofs service screws up
the active mounts on the apps still running and reload only checks the
auto.master file for updates.
Any suggestions on whether or not this is expected behavior, or if I
have something set up wrong?
Many thanks,
Tom
--
Tom Georgoulias
POPI Classification
[x] General Business Information
[] Motorola Internal Use
[] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-24 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 17:16 direct map shut down? Brian Long
2004-02-19 17:21 ` Brian Long
2004-02-20 13:00 ` Ian Kent
2004-02-20 13:44 ` Brian Long
2004-02-21 7:42 ` Ian Kent
2004-02-24 1:02 ` Tom Georgoulias [this message]
2004-02-25 4:09 ` newly added heirarchical mount points not found Ian Kent
2004-02-25 14:18 ` Tom Georgoulias
2004-02-26 2:08 ` Ian Kent
2004-03-01 8:04 ` Ian Kent
2004-02-20 13:04 ` direct map shut down? Ian Kent
2004-02-21 0:37 ` mmarion
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403AA2A7.3010409@motorola.com \
--to=tom.georgoulias@motorola.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.