From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: patch for conntrack expectations Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:54:39 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <403B1F5F.6010004@trash.net> References: <403014C5.8080102@eurodev.net> <20040217213217.GF30968@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> <4032F4DE.3050402@eurodev.net> <20040218172539.GX9464@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <4038B14C.901@eurodev.net> <20040224094014.GV13386@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pablo Neira , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20040224094014.GV13386@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 02:40:28PM +0100, Pablo Neira wrote: > >>- I saw that Patrick submitted recently a patch to clean up the amanda >>helper (BTW, nice work!), I tried to patch my kernel with his patch >>available in patch-o-matic but it failed. So I patched the current. I >>also have no problem about patching the new one. > > > I thought this was included already in the stock kernel. At least in > 2.4.x the patch went in. Patrick, can you comment on this? The 2.4 patch went in, the 2.6 didn't. Some of the problems got fixed in 2.6 when removing skb_linearize, but some didn't. Do you want me to resubmit the patch to you ? Regards Patrick