From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mfedyk@matchmail.com (Mike Fedyk) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:44 +0000 Subject: 2.6.3-mm4 Message-Id: <403F898A.2000801@matchmail.com> List-Id: References: <20040225185536.57b56716.akpm@osdl.org> <403E82D8.3030209@gmx.de> <20040225185536.57b56716.akpm@osdl.org> <20040227001115.GA2627@werewolf.able.es> <20040227004602.GB15075@kroah.com> <1077870909.403f013dd04b6@imp.gcu.info> In-Reply-To: <1077870909.403f013dd04b6@imp.gcu.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jean Delvare Cc: Greg KH , "J.A. Magallon" , "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com Jean Delvare wrote: > Quoting Greg KH : > > >>Anyway, I think all you need to do is get the cvs tree of the >>lmsensors package. Sensors people, the needed changes are commited >>into the tree, right? > > > No. The changes are waiting in my local repository, ready to be applied. > I didn't want to apply them because we were supposed to release > lm_sensors 2.8.5 (for Linux 2.6.3 users) and the sysfs names change > wouldn't belong there. > > The libsensors patches are available on my personal server here: > http://jdelvare.net1.nerim.net/sensors/ > Apply both patches in order and you'll get a 2.6.3-mm4-compliant > library. > > I will apply the libsensors changes to the CVS repository as soon as the > kernel modules changes are accepted into Linus' tree. If we did not > release a new version since there, I'll take a CVS snapshot right > before so that Linux 2.6.3 users have a usable version available (but > my preference strongly goes to releasing 2.8.5 instead). You have to be kidding me. Are you saying that with your patches to libsensors it won't support 2.6.3 style sensor sysfs names? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263086AbUB0SS1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:18:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262906AbUB0SS1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:18:27 -0500 Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.56]:26021 "EHLO mtaw6.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263089AbUB0SRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:17:19 -0500 Message-ID: <403F898A.2000801@matchmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:16:42 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare CC: Greg KH , "J.A. Magallon" , "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com Subject: Re: 2.6.3-mm4 References: <20040225185536.57b56716.akpm@osdl.org> <403E82D8.3030209@gmx.de> <20040225185536.57b56716.akpm@osdl.org> <20040227001115.GA2627@werewolf.able.es> <20040227004602.GB15075@kroah.com> <1077870909.403f013dd04b6@imp.gcu.info> In-Reply-To: <1077870909.403f013dd04b6@imp.gcu.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jean Delvare wrote: > Quoting Greg KH : > > >>Anyway, I think all you need to do is get the cvs tree of the >>lmsensors package. Sensors people, the needed changes are commited >>into the tree, right? > > > No. The changes are waiting in my local repository, ready to be applied. > I didn't want to apply them because we were supposed to release > lm_sensors 2.8.5 (for Linux 2.6.3 users) and the sysfs names change > wouldn't belong there. > > The libsensors patches are available on my personal server here: > http://jdelvare.net1.nerim.net/sensors/ > Apply both patches in order and you'll get a 2.6.3-mm4-compliant > library. > > I will apply the libsensors changes to the CVS repository as soon as the > kernel modules changes are accepted into Linus' tree. If we did not > release a new version since there, I'll take a CVS snapshot right > before so that Linux 2.6.3 users have a usable version available (but > my preference strongly goes to releasing 2.8.5 instead). You have to be kidding me. Are you saying that with your patches to libsensors it won't support 2.6.3 style sensor sysfs names?