From: Kuas <ku4s@users.sourceforge.net>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] System Call Mechanism
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:29:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403FFCED.7060201@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402251652.52680.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Hi Blaisor,
Thanks for the response and info. I am still confused in how the system
call arrive at process.c->userspace(). I guess the proposal in the
presentation
(http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/slides/ols2002/img21.html), it
said the next implementation would be to convert trap call to signal has
never been implemented.
I checked in SKAS and TT mode, the idtr value is the same as the host
machine and I can see from where you pointed, SKAS and TT has the same
trap handler for system_call. But I don't really understand ptrace
control, I am not totally sure how the system call is being intercepted
and sent back to uml ends up in process.c->userspace(). Does every time
interrupt is called, it will be caught by the host kernel ptrace and for
system call (int 0x80) will be redirected back to the UML process. How
does the information about the process that's requesting system call,
syscall#, and arguments being passed to the UML Kernel. I understand
since SKAS mode has collection of Virtual Address Spaces. Correct me if
I'm wrong, will PTRACE_SWITCH_MM first change to the UML kernel process
Address Space. But in SKAS mode, the UML kernel is also in the host
address space (>0xc0000000), during this state we are already in the
kernel space. So which child memory that PTRACE_SWITCH_MM switches when
the system call? I am assuming the active Virtual Memory that's being
replaced in UML process is the current uml process that generate the
system call.
Kuas
BlaisorBlade wrote:
>>I seems to me the new or current implementation of system call involves
>>conversion from interupt 80 at the host OS into signals back in UML
>>kernel. Is this the same mechanism for the current TT and SKAS? Or TT
>>mode still using ptrace thread tracing mechanism to intercept the system
>>call?
>>
>>
>
>SKAS mode, the more modern one, still uses the same interception mechanism as
>TT: i.e. ptraces the child, intercepts the syscall, nullifies it (i.e. the
>host kernel receives a getpid syscall) and goes on. Look at these files:
>
>arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c: handle_trap () and userspace().
>arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall_*.c
>
>Only difference is that in SKAS mode you have one single child process being
>ptraced, on the host; it runs the virtual processes code, and does syscall
>with int 0x80 which are intercepted. To do a context switch, UML uses setjmp
>and longjmp to switch the stack state and PTRACE_SWITCH_MM (implemented on
>the host inside arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c, read the skas patch) to switch the
>virtual mappings of the child at once. More details about memory handling at
>request, since you asked for one exact thing and maybe are not interested in
>this.
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 21:30 [uml-devel] System Call Mechanism kuas
2004-02-25 15:52 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-02-28 2:29 ` Kuas [this message]
2004-02-29 12:26 ` BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403FFCED.7060201@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=ku4s@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.