From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.211]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A694840 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:38:14 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4041B33A.2010802@tiscali.be> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:39:06 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.6 jejb References: <20040228212407.DB126494190@palinux.hppa> <40411464.6050201@tiscali.be> <1078008164.1968.94.camel@mulgrave> In-Reply-To: <1078008164.1968.94.camel@mulgrave> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: PARISC list List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , James Bottomley wrote: > On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 16:21, Joel Soete wrote: > >>Hey interesting, I mean 'torture test'. Where can I get more detail on this stuff to test on the N4K also? > > > It just means running bk doing a tree merge, checking out the results > and compiling the kernel. It seems to sow up most types of problems ... > > James > > > Ah ok , it just sound like some gcc test :) , that is why I though there was bourned a new test for our kernel. Thanks for feedback, Joel PS: I will so prepare such boot kernel for the N ;)