From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maggio Subject: Re: DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx? Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:28:54 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <404356B6.6010407@tin.it> References: <40434209.6020903@tin.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Takashi Iwai wrote: | At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:00:41 +0100, Maggio wrote: | |> Hi , |> |> I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the |> DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards . |> |> I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound |> . |> |> I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had |> any problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of |> the drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3 |> versions of the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't |> work anymore with DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled , |> and I can only use DXS with DXS_SUPPORT=4 . |> |> What's up? | | | i don't know - there are no big changes regarding this area. if | dxs_support=4 works for you, please send me the patch for dxs white | list. | | | Takashi | | | ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is | sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy | apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from | IBM. Click Now! | http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click | _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing | list Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel | Ok , I've made the patch , but I continue to ask me why this regression (on my board) from 0.9.8 to 1.0.2c/1.0.3. Maybe some changes in snd-ac97-codec module? Or what? I've compared the two diffs between 0.9.8 and 1.0.2/1.0.3 and there aren't very much differences in snd-via82xx (primarly them don't seem related to the problem) . The patch is attached. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAQ1a2c/np+8AbwbcRAibsAJ4tcFGPJW0yjCoaNpdUNSZyA4gajgCdEwnq oOldyoycxXiU9q4nGR8GHGA= =fGY0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click