From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part3 (3/3)
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 18:16:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40469194.5080506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040304005542.GZ4922@dualathlon.random>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> This is just like the kernel patches people proposes when they get
> vmalloc LDT allocation failure, because they run with the i686 glibc
> instead of the only possibly supported i586 configuration. It makes no
> sense to hide a glibc inefficiency
You apparently still haven't gotten any clue since your whining the last
time around. Absolute addresses are a fatal mistake.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFARpGU2ijCOnn/RHQRAhs3AJ0XEZ5VGb40VAIPuO4negyo7cx/WwCbBrN6
EFZ7UnY7W/it0sUiq6Dodeg=
=KSMr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-04 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-04 0:11 [RFC][PATCH] vsyscall-gtod_B3 (0/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:12 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part1 (1/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:13 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part2 (2/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.4-pre1_vsyscall-gtod_B3-part3 (3/3) john stultz
2004-03-04 0:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 2:16 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2004-03-04 2:43 ` john stultz
2004-03-04 3:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 8:09 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-04 19:02 ` john stultz
2004-03-04 2:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 2:54 ` john stultz
2004-03-04 3:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 8:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-04 16:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 8:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-04 8:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-04 17:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-04 0:15 ` [RFC] vsyscall-gtod_test_B3.tar.gz john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40469194.5080506@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.