All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: powerpc: possible access beyond TASK_SIZE in start_thread
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:34:12 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40484806.5780.1389328452206.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <607356267.5770.1389328173087.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

Hi Rusty,

I was looking at the diff between kernel v3.12 and recent master (after 3.13-rc7),
and noticed that in the following commit:

commit 94af3abf995b17f6a008b00152c94841242ec6c7
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:   Wed Nov 20 22:15:02 2013 +1100

    powerpc: ELF2 binaries launched directly.

on powerpc, those lines appear in start_thread():

+                       /* start is a relocated pointer to the function
+                        * descriptor for the elf _start routine.  The first
+                        * entry in the function descriptor is the entry
+                        * address of _start and the second entry is the TOC
+                        * value we need to use.
+                        */
+                       __get_user(entry, (unsigned long __user *)start);
+                       __get_user(toc, (unsigned long __user *)start+1);

Note the "__" before get_user(), which bypass any kind of validation on the
addresses.

Amongst the callers, if we look at fs/binfmt_elf.c:load_elf_binary(), we see:

                elf_entry = loc->elf_ex.e_entry;
                if (BAD_ADDR(elf_entry)) {
                        force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
                        retval = -EINVAL;
                        goto out_free_dentry;
                }

and the elf_entry gets passed to start_thread().

If we craft a binary with elf_entry address of

TASK_SIZE - 1  (1 byte before TASK_SIZE), then I think we could make both
__get_user() calls access data beyond TASK_SIZE, because elf_entry address
is verified, but there is no validation on its range AFAIU. Is it expected ?
Am I missing something ?

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

       reply	other threads:[~2014-01-10  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <607356267.5770.1389328173087.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
2014-01-10  4:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2014-01-15  4:56   ` powerpc: possible access beyond TASK_SIZE in start_thread Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40484806.5780.1389328452206.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.