From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo3.tiscali.be [62.235.13.172]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DFD4843 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 05:04:03 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <404B0FF7.4080405@tiscali.be> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 12:05:11 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Sleepy, EWOULDBLOCK != EAGAIN? References: <20040307072733.GL963@baldric.uwo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040307072733.GL963@baldric.uwo.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Carlos O'Donell wrote: > pa, > > Please remind me why we don't make EWOULDBLOCK == EAGAIN? There was a thread (dated Sept 200) starting here: and a followup (dated Oct 2002) starting here: > I know it would break our existing ABI, but Linux apps expect them to be > the same. I remember vaguely some argument about hpux compatibility... > I'm sleepy, but I thought I'd post so I don't forget. > > I'm reminded of this because update-menus is complaining about locks > during a recent 712/100 install, and it all came flooding back. > > c. > hth, Joel