From: Carsten Maass <cm@blinkenlichten.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Iptables / KAME IPSec problem: source port information lost
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:27:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404DB826.3000709@blinkenlichten.de> (raw)
Dear List,
my network layout looks like this:
----------------------------------
(Localnet A)---(Gateway A)==IPSec==(Gateway B)---(Localnet B)
where "==IPSec==" is a IPSec connection using the backport of the 2.6
KAME IPSec stack on a static 2.4.24 kernel in tunnel-mode. Both gateways
are running Debian stable with racoon and the ipsec-tools coming from
testing:
kernel-source-2.4.24 2.4.24-3
iptables 1.2.6a-5
ipsec-tools 0.2.2-8
racoon 0.2.2-8
My problem is:
--------------
At some point in the filtering process, the information about the source
ports of the incoming and decrypted packet gets lost, so that the
clients on the localnet don't accept it as one of the established
connection.
Here is some example:
---------------------
The tcpdump was taken on Gateway A, listening on all interfaces.
Client 192.168.3.4 on Localnet A tries to establish a http-connection to
client 192.168.0.1 on Localnet B.
12:05:48.370984 192.168.3.4.35114 > 192.168.0.1.80: S
3186461765:3186461765(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 220395665
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
The initial packet...
12:05:48.372462 218.10.35.139 > 146.254.136.108:
ESP(spi=0x0a6825be,seq=0xaf) (DF)
...gets correctly encrypted and sent out to Gateway B (146.254.136.108).
12:05:48.447361 146.254.136.108 > 218.10.35.139:
ESP(spi=0x03e34241,seq=0xa5) (DF)
The encrypted response arrives at Gateway A (218.10.35.139).
12:05:48.447361 192.168.0.1.80 > 192.168.3.4.35114: S
969293027:969293027(0) ack 3186461766 win 5792 <mss
1460,sackOK,timestamp 2220996862 220395665,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
The packet gets decrypted, the source port is correct.
12:05:48.448584 192.168.0.1.1 > 192.168.3.4.35114: S
969293027:969293027(0) ack 3186461766 win 5792 <mss
1460,sackOK,timestamp 2220996862 220395665,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
And here the strange thing apperars: The packet is sent out with a
source port of 1!
12:05:48.448816 192.168.3.4.35114 > 192.168.0.1.1: R
3186461766:3186461766(0) win 0 (DF)
As it comes from source port 1, the client does not recognize it as a
packet which belongs to the established connection and rejects it.
12:05:48.449038 218.10.35.139 > 192.168.0.1:
ESP(spi=0x0a6825be,seq=0xb0) (DF)
The reject gets encrypted, sent out over the tunnel and the game starts
over again.
Portless connections like ping don't show this behavior and gets
established correctly.
So my questions are:
--------------------
I this an iptables problem or IPSec related?
Can you think of any iptables rules, which causes this behavior?
Do you know how to explore this problem further?
Do you have any other hints?
I hope i was able to make the problem clear. Please tell me if you need
more information. As i have no clue how to go on with this problem, any
help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks for your time and patience,
Carsten.
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 12:27 Carsten Maass [this message]
2004-03-09 19:36 ` Iptables / KAME IPSec problem: source port information lost Alexander Samad
2004-03-10 14:16 ` Carsten Maass
2004-03-13 22:16 ` [solved] " Carsten Maass
2004-03-13 22:35 ` Antony Stone
2004-03-14 0:55 ` Carsten Maass
2004-03-14 9:13 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404DB826.3000709@blinkenlichten.de \
--to=cm@blinkenlichten.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.