From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
Subject: Re: Nehemiah differences
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:53:08 +0100
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <404DCC44.5000300@SSpaeth.de>
References: <E1B0fu1-0003t7-OA@www.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E1B0fu1-0003t7-OA@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

I have got a Via 10K Nehemiah board (model 9), stepping 1.
If you need to perform some (non-destructive) test for this case, feel 
free to ask me (via direct mail).

Sebastian Spaeth