From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiserfs v3 vs v4 bonnie++ benchmarks Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:38:26 +0300 Message-ID: <404E0112.7080904@namesys.com> References: <404DFACE.4090008@namesys.com> <404DFDBA.8040006@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mihai RUSU Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Mihai RUSU wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > >>>This one: >>>62922 for v3 and 52469 for v4 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>what is the amount of ram vs. the amount written? If you write 10x the >>ram, does the performance loss go away? >> >> > >bonnie++ writes by default in the "block" tests double of memory (so it >makes sure the cache has a small impact). I have 512 mb of ram and the >ammount of data written was 1gb. I can force it to write 10x ... >considering what I said here do you still want that ? > >- -- >Mihai RUSU Email: dizzy@roedu.net >GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roedu.net > "Linux is obsolete" -- AST >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFATf+iPZzOzrZY/1QRAhIQAJ0W4Y7gvIMp0TnpXXXE9kubMgrr/wCePHCM >LBpuALzT+Mun64EcyAMd4bc= >=wQqP >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > Yes, it would be interesting. I think maybe we need to tweak reiser4 more for benchmarks near to ram size. -- Hans