From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Mihai RUSU <dizzy@roedu.net>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr>
Subject: Re: reiserfs v3 vs v4 bonnie++ benchmarks
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:33:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404EB6C7.9000909@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.0403092308420.17447@ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net>
Mihai RUSU wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>
>>Yes, it would be interesting. I think maybe we need to tweak reiser4
>>more for benchmarks near to ram size.
>>
>>
>
>Hi again
>
>I have repeated the "block" read/write tests asking bonnie++ to write 5 GB
>of data (10x my RAM size).
>
>reiser v3:
>Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
>Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
>dizzywork 5G 17340 89 46074 15 22140 5 16473 85 46145 6 102.8 0
>dizzywork,5G,17340,89,46074,15,22140,5,16473,85,46145,6,102.8,0,,,,,,,,,,,,,
>
>reiser v4:
>Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
>Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
>dizzywork 5G 17491 90 48452 14 23563 11 17426 89 47952 8 110.9 0
>dizzywork,5G,17491,90,48452,14,23563,11,17426,89,47952,8,110.9,0,,,,,,,,,,,,,
>
>You were right. The values now seem almost the same (well, reiser4 seems a
>little bit better).
>
>Should I repeat the "many small files" tests too with lots more files ?
>
>
>
>>--
>>Hans
>>
>>
>
>- --
>Mihai RUSU Email: dizzy@roedu.net
>GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roedu.net
> "Linux is obsolete" -- AST
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFATjObPZzOzrZY/1QRAnOMAJ4glX0TXNnuz3hbKQiR4SGijXvE1QCePYOd
>HPRGgqPvWMuUb/UYIzUGtLE=
>=Gyjj
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
Sure. Thanks for repeating it.
Yann, I think you will get the same effect if you repeat with 10x larger
fileset. Reiser4 is not tuned for size of ram benchmarks, and I don't
think it should be.
--
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 16:27 reiserfs v3 vs v4 bonnie++ benchmarks Mihai RUSU
2004-03-09 17:11 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-09 17:18 ` Mihai RUSU
2004-03-09 17:24 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-09 17:32 ` Mihai RUSU
2004-03-09 17:38 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-09 21:14 ` Mihai RUSU
2004-03-10 6:33 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-03-11 8:33 ` Mihai RUSU
2004-03-25 23:35 ` Mike Fedyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404EB6C7.9000909@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr \
--cc=dizzy@roedu.net \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.