From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:49:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404F7F54.1000105@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040120011734.GB6309@kroah.com
Looks like the MODULE_VERSION macro is now in the tree.
Greg, any status on the sysfs patch you mention below?
thanks,
Brian
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>>In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write:
>>
>>>Rusty,
>>> Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending.
>>
>>Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were
>>frozen.
>>
>>This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or
>>a work of obvious beauty and genius?
>
>
> Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this?
>
>
>>Doesn't put things in sysfs, but Greg was working on that for module
>>parameters... Greg?
>
>
> Oh yeah, I'll dig out that patch later this week. An older version has
> been sitting in my bk tree forever, need to update it with the last
> changes you sent me.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com>
2004-01-20 0:57 ` Question on MODULE_VERSION macro Rusty Russell
2004-01-20 1:17 ` Greg KH
2004-01-20 7:47 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-20 21:44 ` Brian King
2004-02-21 1:07 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-22 23:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-23 3:51 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-23 21:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-24 6:13 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-25 21:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-26 1:50 ` Rusty Russell
2004-02-26 7:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-03-10 20:49 ` Brian King [this message]
2004-03-10 21:08 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404F7F54.1000105@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.