From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Macdonald <alexandermacdonald@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6 patches broken with 2.6.4
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:31:15 +0000
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Message-ID: <405120F3.3060305@yahoo.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312022129550.2970-100000@raven.themaw.net>
	<4050BE51.6010908@yahoo.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0403120910270.7863@wombat.indigo.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403120910270.7863@wombat.indigo.net.au>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: autofs@linux.kernel.org

Ian Kent wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. How long and in what environment have you been 
> using them.


Well admittedly my testing has been with only a few pc's each with about 4-5 
shares, none of them SMP boxes. So not at all thorough or stressful compared to 
what some people on the list are using it for.

Alex