Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper breaks IPSec tunnels

[Damion de Soto <damion@snapgear.com>]

Hi Jason,
> But isn't that where it would be if I did nothing to it?  Only the
> really bad traffic gets put in 1:30, right?  BTW, the middle class is
> 1:20, correct?
Yeah, it is.  I can't recall exactly why I did that, but it doesn't seem to make 
sense now.
Oh, yes I can.  I have other filters setup for TOS bits, and wanted to make sure that 
no matter what TOS bits the ipsec packets had, they were going into 1:20.

> Nope.  Haven't changed those values.  Do I want to?  I basically want
> any traffic of lower priority to be able to take all the bandwidth as
> long as there is no traffic of a higher priority around, but have it
> give way to higher priority traffic when present.
I guess it depends on whether or not you want delays.  I try to keep my ceil values 
just a little bit below the max they could hit.
although I guess it's probabaly not really noticable.

> | which means they get set to the rate value, and unless you've changed
> | the way it calculates it's percentage rate values, the sum of the leaf
> | rates can exceed the parent.
> | which i believe can lead to weird and/or bad behaviour.
> 
> Hmm.  Guess I'll have to look into this more.
yeah, check out "What if sum of child rates is greater than parent rate ?"
on http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbfaq.htm

regards

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Damion de Soto - Software Engineer  email:     damion@snapgear.com
SnapGear - A CyberGuard Company ---    ph:         +61 7 3435 2809
  | Custom Embedded Solutions          fax:         +61 7 3891 3630
  | and Security Appliances            web: http://www.snapgear.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ---  Free Embedded Linux Distro at   http://www.snapgear.org  ---

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/