All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: sched_setaffinity usability -- other issue
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:47:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4059E0B2.4030601@nortelnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 40595842.5070708@redhat.com

I have a different issue with setting cpu affinity.  Has anyone 
considered a "soft" affinity?

I'm thinking of the case where I want to run processes on separate cpus 
for performance reasons, but in the case that one cpu becomes 
unavailable (physically removed, hardware fault, etc.) I would like to 
move those processes back to working cpus (except for maybe the one that 
was actually running and therefore might be corrupted).  In this case a 
reduced performance might be preferable to an unplanned failover to 
backup hardware.

Has this scenario been considered, or will cpu affinity be a "hard" setting.

Chris


      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-18 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-18  8:05 sched_setaffinity usability Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18  8:12 ` Tim Hockin
2004-03-18  8:22   ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18  8:47     ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18  9:45 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 10:10   ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 12:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-18 12:31     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-19  8:05       ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-03-18 15:55     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-03-18 18:24       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 18:33         ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 18:39           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 18:55             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 20:01             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 20:28               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 20:49         ` David Lang
2004-03-18 20:57           ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-03-18 21:06           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-18 21:07         ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-18 21:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-19  1:37             ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-19  9:02         ` Helge Hafting
2004-03-21  9:51           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-19  0:00       ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-18 17:47 ` Chris Friesen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4059E0B2.4030601@nortelnetworks.com \
    --to=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.