All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@intel.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel]  mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not uptodate in JBDroutine journal_create() in kernel 2.6.
Date: Thu Mar 18 21:15:39 2004	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <405A65E8.3010904@intel.com> (raw)

Hi Stephen,

I found a bug in JBD routine journal_create() in kernel 2.6, when I debug
the OCFS v2 driver.  mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not
uptodate. See following bug description.

-------------------------------------------------------

OS: Linux Kernel 2.6.1
Plarform: IA32

Steps:
1. Build the ocfs v2 driver under kernel 2.6.
2. insert ocfs2.ko into kernel 2.6.
3. mkfs.ocfs2 -F -b 4 -l testocfs -m /mnt/ocfs2 /dev/hdb2
4. mount -t ocfs2 /dev/hdb2 /mnt/ocfs2

Results:
buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:1266
Call Trace:
[<>] mark_buffer_dirty
[<>] journal_create
[<>] ocfs_journal_create
[<>] ocfs_check_volume
[<>] ocfs_mount_volume
......

-------------------------------------------------------

I think I found the root cause of the bug reported in mark_buffer_dirty().

It is caused in the Linux journaling routine(JBD) journal_create(). In 
kernel 2.6.x, buffer_head state BH_Uptodate is checked in mark_buffer_dirty(), 
while kernel 2.4.x doesn't do. If this state doesn't exist in the buffer_head, 
buffer error information is reported. But, in routine journal_create(), the state
BH_Uptodate is set after the call to mark_buffer_dirty(). This works well in
kernel 2.4.x, but fails in kernel 2.6.x.

I attach a patch to fix this bug in kernel 2.6.x. Please check if it works well in
kernel 2.6.x.

-------------------------------------------------------

--- linux-2.6.4a/fs/jbd/journal.c	2004-03-19 10:40:49.264613984 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.4/fs/jbd/journal.c	2004-03-19 10:41:12.091143824 +0800
@@ -832,10 +832,10 @@
 		bh = __getblk(journal->j_dev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
 		lock_buffer(bh);
 		memset (bh->b_data, 0, journal->j_blocksize);
-		BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "marking dirty");
-		mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
 		BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "marking uptodate");
 		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+		BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "marking dirty");
+		mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
 		unlock_buffer(bh);
 		__brelse(bh);
 	}



--Sonic Zhang

                 reply	other threads:[~2004-03-18 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=405A65E8.3010904@intel.com \
    --to=sonic.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.