From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:24:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <405B1EA5.3030701@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040318221904.45011167.davem@redhat.com>
David S. Miller wrote:
> Other than the minor comments I've made the most unhappy I am
> with the input patch, and you agree it's grotty too. Let's look
> for a better solution, perhaps with new top-level SKB state,
> and then we can put all of your work in after you're made the other
> minor fixes I've asked for as well.
I'm going to make the changes you suggested. Can you please explain what
you imagine with the new top-level skb state ?
Regards
Patrick
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-08 11:03 ip_route_me_harder -> xfrm_lookup Herbert Xu
2004-03-08 14:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-08 19:58 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-18 16:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-18 16:31 ` [RFC, PATCH 1/5]: netfilter+ipsec - nf_reset Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 6:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-18 16:31 ` [RFC, PATCH 2/5]: netfilter+ipsec - output hooks Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 6:09 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-19 10:59 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-20 21:45 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-18 16:32 ` [RFC, PATCH 3/5]: netfilter+ipsec - input hooks Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-19 11:47 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-19 16:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 21:05 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-19 11:07 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-19 11:46 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-19 16:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-18 16:32 ` [RFC, PATCH 4/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy lookup Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 6:16 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-19 15:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 11:51 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-19 16:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 21:05 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-20 14:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-21 6:35 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-21 22:16 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-21 23:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-22 2:03 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-22 2:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-24 2:15 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-24 2:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-24 3:33 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-18 16:32 ` [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 6:19 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-19 6:31 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-20 5:58 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-20 15:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-19 16:24 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=405B1EA5.3030701@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.