From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfs logging patches udpated
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:41:21 -0800
Message-ID: <406343F1.2050504@matchmail.com>
References: <1080149399.14737.77.camel@watt.suse.com>	 <20040324143516.3162cbfe.akpm@osdl.org>	 <1080168379.14743.124.camel@watt.suse.com>	 <200403250147.54246.bernd-schubert@web.de> <40625867.4060800@matchmail.com> <1080224062.26677.3.camel@watt.suse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-17479-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1080224062.26677.3.camel@watt.suse.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>

Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:56, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> 
> 
>>And after having the difference of a block level journal (ext3), instead 
>>of a "virtual" journal(reiserfs, jfs, xfs) explained to me (check the 
>>ext3-users archives...) -- and how it can save your ass when there are 
>>hardware problems.  I was convinced and switched everything back to ext3.
> 
> 
> reiserfs does block based logging ;-)

I stand corrected.

Thanks Chris, I feel much better about reiserfs now, especially with 
your ordered/data journaling patches.

Mike