From: mds4@verizon.net (Mark Studebaker)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: No sensors found!
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4064D98E.9060203@verizon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62A29338972397468405C79C4FE13C3B916AFA@ex1.messagegate.local>
That's your problem then.
Perhaps Redhat 9 includes the module but it is lost :);
perhaps it includes it but it wasn't built by default, and you'll have to build it;
perhaps it doesn't include it and you'll need to install our package from our website.
If you don't know how to do this it will be a good learning experience :)
good luck
mds
Jennifer Villar wrote:
> I get the following error even though I believe I ran it before without
> error.
>
> modprobe: Can't locate module w83627hf
>
> Attached is the dmesg file. I didn't see anything in it that refers the
> the w83627hf module.
>
> When I said I am new to Linux I mean several days new so if I miss
> something I wouldn't be surprised.
>
>
> Thanks for your speedy response.
>
> -Jenn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Studebaker [mailto:mds4@verizon.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 5:07 PM
> To: Jennifer Villar
> Cc: sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com
> Subject: Re: No sensors found!
>
> you don't show w83627hf loaded.
> modprobe it again to be sure then check dmesg for clues.
>
> Jennifer Villar wrote:
>
>> -->
>>
>>I am a complete newbie here cutting my teeth on RedHat 9 Kernel
>>2.4.20-8smp. I am trying to get lm_sensors to work but I continually
>
> get
>
>>the "No Sensors found!" error. I have followed the instructions that
>>sensors-detect has provided (except the /etc/rc* entries as I am not
>>sure which file to put the entries into, any?).
>>
>>
>>
>>I am using a Supermicro server with an Intel 857 chipset and the Super
>
>
>>P4SCA motherboard. Unfortunately I cannot look at the mother board as
>>the system is racked.
>>
>>
>>
>>Here is some of the information I have that may shed light to someone
>>who knows a thing or two about this stuff.
>>
>>
>>
>># Results from lsmod
>>
>>
>>
>>Module Size Used by Not tainted
>>
>>i2c-isa 1868 0 (unused)
>>
>>i2c-dev 5636 0
>>
>>i2c-philips-par 3360 0 (unused)
>>
>>parport 39072 0 [i2c-philips-par]
>>
>>i2c-elv 2408 0
>>
>>i2c-algo-bit 8872 1 [i2c-philips-par i2c-elv]
>>
>>i2c-proc 9232 0
>>
>>i2c-core 19908 0 [i2c-isa i2c-dev i2c-algo-bit
>
> i2c-proc]
>
>>autofs 13684 0 (autoclean) (unused)
>>
>>e1000 70400 1
>>
>>ipt_REJECT 3928 0 (autoclean)
>>
>>iptable_filter 2412 0 (autoclean)
>>
>>ip_tables 15864 2 [ipt_REJECT iptable_filter]
>>
>>keybdev 2976 0 (unused)
>>
>>mousedev 5656 0 (unused)
>>
>>hid 22308 0 (unused)
>>
>>input 6208 0 [keybdev mousedev hid]
>>
>>usb-uhci 27404 0 (unused)
>>
>>ehci-hcd 20456 0 (unused)
>>
>>usbcore 82592 1 [hid usb-uhci ehci-hcd]
>>
>>ext3 73376 2
>>
>>jbd 56336 2 [ext3]
>>
>>
>>
>># Output of sensors-detect
>>
>> Detects correctly:
>>
>> * ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
>>
>> Chip `Winbond W83627HF Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I will now generate the commands needed to load the I2C modules.
>>
>> Sometimes, a chip is available both through the ISA bus and an I2C
>
> bus.
>
>> ISA bus access is faster, but you need to load an additional driver
>
> module
>
>> for it. If you have the choice, do you want to use the ISA bus or the
>>
>> I2C/SMBus (ISA/smbus)? Driver `w83627hf' (should be inserted):
>>
>> Detects correctly:
>>
>> * ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
>>
>> Chip `Winbond W83627HF Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
>>
>>
>>
>>To make the sensors modules behave correctly, add these lines to
>>
>>/etc/modules.conf:
>>
>>
>>
>>#----cut here----
>>
>># I2C module options
>>
>>alias char-major-89 i2c-dev
>>
>>#----cut here----
>>
>>
>>
>>To load everything that is needed, add this to some /etc/rc* file:
>>
>>
>>
>>#----cut here----
>>
>># I2C adapter drivers
>>
>>modprobe i2c-isa
>>
>># I2C chip drivers
>>
>>modprobe w83627hf
>>
>># sleep 2 # optional
>>
>>/usr/bin/sensors -s # recommended
>>
>>#----cut here----
>>
>>
>>
>>Any information would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>>-Jennifer
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found! Jennifer Villar
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker [this message]
2006-01-26 17:53 ` [lm-sensors] " samag70-2
2006-01-26 18:36 ` Jim Cromie
2006-01-26 18:44 ` samag70-2
2006-01-26 19:16 ` Rudolf Marek
2006-01-27 13:46 ` samag70-2
2006-01-27 17:06 ` Rudolf Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4064D98E.9060203@verizon.net \
--to=mds4@verizon.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.