From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Weaver <weav@sigma.net>
Subject: Buffer size on Intel 8x0
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:35:21 -0800
Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <4065AD49.5080805@sigma.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=alsa-devel>
To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org


Is there any reason the buffer_bytes_max couldn't be increased beyond 128K on 
the Intel 8x0 driver?  I'm running into overruns on a capture system when it 
gets a bit busy.

Thanks.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click