From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] speed up SATA Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:49:19 -0500 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4067101F.9030606@pobox.com> References: <4066021A.20308@pobox.com> <40661049.1050004@yahoo.com.au> <406611CA.3050804@pobox.com> <406616EE.80301@pobox.com> <4066191E.4040702@yahoo.com.au> <40662108.40705@pobox.com> <20040328135124.GA32597@mail.shareable.org> <40670A36.3000005@pobox.com> <20040328174013.GJ24370@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:11733 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262292AbUC1Rtc (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:49:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040328174013.GJ24370@suse.de> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jamie Lokier , Nick Piggin , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton Jens Axboe wrote: > What would be nice (and I seem to recall that Andre also pushed for > this) would be the FUA bit doubling as an ordered tag indicator when > using TCQ. It's one of those things that keep ATA squarely outside of > the big machine uses. That other OS had a differing opinion of what to > do with that, so... Preach on, brother Jens :) I agree completely. Or, the ATA guys could use SCSI's ordered tags / linked commands. Regardless, there's ATA dain bramage that needs fixing... Sigh. Jeff