From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiserfs logging patches udpated Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 05:10:22 -0800 Message-ID: <4068203E.4050700@namesys.com> References: <1080149399.14737.77.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040324143516.3162cbfe.akpm@osdl.org> <1080168379.14743.124.camel@watt.suse.com> <200403250147.54246.bernd-schubert@web.de> <40625867.4060800@matchmail.com> <1080224062.26677.3.camel@watt.suse.com> <406343F1.2050504@matchmail.com> <1080247847.2926.0.camel@watt.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1080247847.2926.0.camel@watt.suse.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Chris Mason Cc: Mike Fedyk , Bernd Schubert , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Andrew Morton Chris Mason wrote: >On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 15:41, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > >>Chris Mason wrote: >> >> >>>On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 22:56, Mike Fedyk wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>And after having the difference of a block level journal (ext3), instead >>>>of a "virtual" journal(reiserfs, jfs, xfs) explained to me (check the >>>>ext3-users archives...) -- and how it can save your ass when there are >>>>hardware problems. I was convinced and switched everything back to ext3. >>>> >>>> >>>reiserfs does block based logging ;-) >>> >>> >>I stand corrected. >> >>Thanks Chris, I feel much better about reiserfs now, especially with >>your ordered/data journaling patches. >> >> > >One other point, the current patch set only does data=ordered. I wanted >that fully stabilized before I enabled data=journal. > >-chris > > > > > > what is a virtual journal? -- Hans