All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Devaraj Das <ddas@india.hp.com>
To: Lane Powers <lpowers@mis.net>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6 IPsec and netfilter
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:51:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40683F11.92AD4E22@india.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 40681861.1030704@mis.net

Lets take for this discussion a simple case where
* we want to disable 10.0.1.5's access to port 5000 on another machine 10.0.1.1.

* 10.0.1.5, however, has access to all other ports on 10.0.1.1.
* Another machine 10.0.1.6 has access to all ports on 10.0.1.1.
* Creating tunnels to 10.0.1.1 may not be possible on all machines.
* All the clients have to necessarily go through the ipsec protocols...
* racoon is the key mgmt daemon.

Please let me know your inputs...

Thanks,
Devaraj.

Lane Powers wrote:

> Well, it might not be perfect, but here is what I do, and it 'works for me'
>
> In my ipsec.conf I use the updown script functionality of pluto, i.e. in
> my conn default I put
>          leftupdown=/usr/local/bin/updown.sh
>
> and then that script is responsible for setting netfilter rules for that
> ip while the tunnel is up, i.e.
>
> #!/bin/bash
> if [ "$PLUTO_VERB" == "up-client" ] || [ "$PLUTO_VERB" == "up-host" ] ; then
>          iptables -N $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p tcp --dport 23 -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p tcp --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p tcp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p icmp --icmp-type echo-reply
> -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A  $PLUTO_CONNECTION -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request
> -j ACCEPT;
>          iptables -A $PLUTO_CONNECTION -j ACCEPT
>          iptables -I INPUT -s $PLUTO_PEER -j $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          iptables -I FORWARD -s $PLUTO_PEER -j $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          exit 0;
> elif [ "$PLUTO_VERB" == "down-client" ] || [ "$PLUTO_VERB" ==
> "down-host" ] ; then
>          iptables -D INPUT -s $PLUTO_PEER -j $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          iptables -D FORWARD -s $PLUTO_PEER -j $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          iptables -F $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          iptables -X $PLUTO_CONNECTION;
>          exit 0;
> fi
>          exit 0;
>
> obviously if you needed different rules per tunnel you could just move
> the updown into the individual conn and define a seperate script per
> connection with different rules.  all of the $PLUTO_... stuff is set in
> the ENV while the connection is being built... obviously for me, my
> FORWARD chain is a default drop, so I am just inserting at the top and
> allowing what I want for the duration of the tunnel.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Lane
>
> Devaraj Das wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I wanted to know whether there is a working solution for the issue that
> > was discussed sometime back:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg22099.html
> > In short is there any solution to enable blocking selective ports in a
> > machine running Linux 2.6.0 + in-kernel ipsec.
> > I would be very helpful if I can get a working solution or some
> > information on a possible solution.
> > Thanks,
> > Devaraj.
> >
> >



  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-29 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-29 11:10 kernel 2.6 IPsec and netfilter Devaraj Das
2004-03-29 12:33 ` Thomas Lussnig
2004-03-29 15:13   ` Devaraj Das
2004-03-29 12:36 ` Lane Powers
2004-03-29 15:21   ` Devaraj Das [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-14 18:51 Dobersberger Dieter
2004-01-15  3:06 ` Dobersberger Dieter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40683F11.92AD4E22@india.hp.com \
    --to=ddas@india.hp.com \
    --cc=lpowers@mis.net \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.