All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dm: dm-crypt: Do not split write operations with zoned targets
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 23:43:28 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40690cc0-e941-4db1-904c-a5d60718d852@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c9898e1-3fae-d271-b0b8-a23371d22cb0@redhat.com>

On 6/25/25 23:03, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> 
>> On 6/25/25 19:19, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>
>>>> +	bool wrt = op_is_write(bio_op(bio));
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (wrt) {
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * For zoned devices, splitting write operations creates the
>>>> +		 * risk of deadlocking queue freeze operations with zone write
>>>> +		 * plugging BIO work when the reminder of a split BIO is
>>>> +		 * issued. So always allow the entire BIO to proceed.
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		if (ti->emulate_zone_append)
>>>> +			return bio_sectors(bio);
>>>
>>> The overrun may still happen (if the user changes the dm table while some 
>>> bio is in progress) and if it happens, you should terminate the bio with 
>>> DM_MAPIO_KILL (like it was in my original patch).
>>
>> I am confused... Overrun against what ? We are now completely ignoring the
>> max_write_size limit so even if the user changes it, that will not affect the
>> BIO processing. If you are referring to an overrun against the zoned device
>> max_hw_sectors limit, it is not possible since changing limits is done with the
>> DM device queue frozen, so we are guaranteed that there will be no BIO in-flight.
>>
>> I am not sure about what kind of table change you are thinking of, but at the
>> very least,  dm_table_supports_size_change() ensure that there cannot be any
>> device size change for a zoned DM device. And given the above point about limits
>> changes, I do not see how a table change can affect the BIO execution.
>>
>> Do you have a specific example in mind ?
> 
> What happens if a bio that is larger than "BIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SHIFT" 
> enters dm_split_and_process_bio? Where will the bio be split? I don't see 
> it, but maybe I'm missing something.

See patch 3 of the v3 I sent: dm_zone_bio_needs_split() and
dm_split_and_process_bio() have been modified to always endup with need_split ==
true for zone write BIOs, and that causes a call to bio_split_to_limits(). So
dm-crypt will always see BIOs that are smaller than limits->max_hw_sectors,
which is set to BIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT in dm-crypt io_hint. So
dm-crypt can never see a write BIO that is larger than BIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SHIFT.


> 
> Mikulas
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  5:59 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix write operation handling for zoned DM devices Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] block: Introduce bio_needs_zone_write_plugging() Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  6:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-25  6:14     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  6:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-25  6:17         ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dm: Always split write BIOs to zoned device limits Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-25  6:15     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dm: dm-crypt: Do not split write operations with zoned targets Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25 10:19   ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-06-25 12:54     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25 14:03       ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-06-25 14:43         ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-06-25 16:33           ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-06-25  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dm: Check for forbidden splitting of zone write operations Damien Le Moal
2025-06-25  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40690cc0-e941-4db1-904c-a5d60718d852@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.