From: Ozgur AKAN <akan@aiqa.com>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: iptables-save and iptables difference
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:50:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <406934E5.8080006@aiqa.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 631 bytes --]
Hi,
I found that iptables-save and iptables process interface mask value
(iniface_mask) differently.
if you add a rule to iptables with this command,
"iptables -A test -i + -j ACCEPT" (by the way, this is same with giving
no interface value)
iptables-save discards the + sign (...because this is same with giving
no interface value)
however iptables -nvL command shows "+" as the input interface. (which
shall be null as iptables-save does)
I know this is not a bug but I think it should be fixed. If it is worth
to do I would like to prepare a patch for it.
I would like to be pleased to hear your comments,
Ozgur AKAN
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1069 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2004-03-30 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=406934E5.8080006@aiqa.com \
--to=akan@aiqa.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.